Someone to Watch Over Me
1987 · Directed by Ridley Scott
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Ultra Based
Critics rated this 51 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1052 of 1469.
Representation Casting
Score: 15/100
The cast includes several actors of color in supporting roles, reflecting the diversity of 1980s New York, though this diversity is not thematized or highlighted by the film.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 0/100
No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation are present in this heterosexual romantic thriller.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 20/100
Female characters are confined to traditional roles as objects of desire and protection. Mimi Rogers' character lacks agency, while Lorraine Bracco's working-class wife is portrayed as jealous and inferior to the wealthy woman.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 0/100
The film contains no exploration of race, racial dynamics, or racial consciousness. Race is not a thematic concern.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
No environmental or climate themes are present in this 1980s thriller.
Eat the Rich
Score: 25/100
The film is preoccupied with class difference and dramatizes the gulf between working-class and aristocratic worlds, but romanticizes wealth and presents it as seductive rather than critiquing capitalist systems.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
The film presents conventional beauty standards without commentary or progressive messaging about body diversity.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
No neurodivergent characters or themes are present in this film.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
This is not a historical film and contains no revisionist historical elements.
Lecture Energy
Score: 5/100
The film prioritizes visual style and romantic tension over preachy messaging. Any social observations emerge incidentally from the narrative rather than through explicit thematic instruction.
Synopsis
Claire Gregory, an upper class New York personality, witnesses a murder in a luxurious nightclub. Detective Mike Keegan, recently promoted, is assigned to protect her.
Consciousness Assessment
Ridley Scott's 1987 neo-noir romance is centered on the erotics of transgression rather than systemic critique. The narrative hinges on class difference as a source of dramatic and sexual tension, but this tension is presented as a problem to be overcome through individual will and desire rather than as evidence of structural inequality worth examining. The detective's wife, portrayed by Lorraine Bracco, becomes a symbol of his former life's ordinariness, while the wealthy socialite represents sophistication and allure. The film luxuriates in the visual trappings of Manhattan wealth without interrogating the systems that produce it. Scott's visual style takes precedence over any social commentary, rendering class as aesthetic rather than ethical. The female characters exist primarily as objects of male desire and protection, their agency constrained by the needs of the thriller plot. This is a film made in 1987 that treats class as romantic scenery, not as a subject worthy of serious examination. What cultural awareness the film displays is incidental to its primary concerns: suspense, visual elegance, and the seduction of crossing social boundaries.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“The situation might have seemed merely a script writer's contrivance except that Howard Franklin ("The Name of the Rose") has fashioned a plot that is both convincing and affecting. Director Ridley Scott happily keeps the human situation in the foreground while exercising his remarkable visual talent. [5 Nov 1987]”
“There are splendid economies, too: Rogers' mirrored dressing-room registers first as a social humiliation for the cop, who can't find the exit, but later his intimacy with her surroundings gives him an edge over a killer. There's little waste, though the thriller element could have been tuned up a bit.”
“Much of the credit for what works in the film should go to the excellent cast. Berenger is superb, and Rogers proves here that she can handle a lead role with class and aplomb. Bracco, however, steals the picture with a refreshing energy and wit.”
“Howard Franklin's screenplay plays less like a feature film than like the pilot for a failed television series about New York policemen.”
Consciousness Markers
The cast includes several actors of color in supporting roles, reflecting the diversity of 1980s New York, though this diversity is not thematized or highlighted by the film.
No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation are present in this heterosexual romantic thriller.
Female characters are confined to traditional roles as objects of desire and protection. Mimi Rogers' character lacks agency, while Lorraine Bracco's working-class wife is portrayed as jealous and inferior to the wealthy woman.
The film contains no exploration of race, racial dynamics, or racial consciousness. Race is not a thematic concern.
No environmental or climate themes are present in this 1980s thriller.
The film is preoccupied with class difference and dramatizes the gulf between working-class and aristocratic worlds, but romanticizes wealth and presents it as seductive rather than critiquing capitalist systems.
The film presents conventional beauty standards without commentary or progressive messaging about body diversity.
No neurodivergent characters or themes are present in this film.
This is not a historical film and contains no revisionist historical elements.
The film prioritizes visual style and romantic tension over preachy messaging. Any social observations emerge incidentally from the narrative rather than through explicit thematic instruction.