WT

Sense and Sensibility

1995 · Directed by Ang Lee

🧘4

Woke Score

84

Critic

🍿83

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 80 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #273 of 1469.

Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

The Dashwood sisters, sensible Elinor and passionate Marianne, learn that their prospects of marriage seem doomed by their family's sudden loss of fortune. After Henry Dashwood dies unexpectedly, his estate must pass on by law to his son. These circumstances leave Mr. Dashwood's wife and daughters without a home and with barely enough money to live on. As Elinor and Marianne struggle to find romantic fulfillment in a society obsessed with financial and social status, they must learn to mix sense with sensibility in their dealings with both money and men.

Consciousness Assessment

Sense and Sensibility arrives as a period adaptation of impeccable pedigree, a faithful rendering of Austen's 1811 novel that concerns itself primarily with the historical realities of women's economic dependence and the marriage market as survival mechanism. Emma Thompson's screenplay and performance capture the source material's ironic distance from its own concerns, a quality that distinguishes Austen from the preachy impulses of contemporary progressive cinema. The film examines class anxiety, mercenary marriage, and female agency within the constraints of Regency society, but these observations belong to the text itself rather than to any contemporary cultural intervention.

Ang Lee's direction emphasizes visual restraint and emotional subtlety. The cinematography privileges landscape and interior space as expressions of the sisters' emotional states. There is no heavy-handed messaging about gender or economics, only the quiet observation that women of this period possessed limited options and had to navigate them with intelligence and feeling. The film takes its source material seriously without feeling compelled to improve upon it or retrofit it with modern sensibilities.

What emerges from this approach is a work that respects both its audience and its material. The absence of contemporary progressive framings is not a deficiency but rather a fidelity to Austen's own method: irony, observation, and the detailed rendering of human constraint rather than exhortation toward change. This is simply a very good adaptation of a very good novel, made with craft and intelligence, which happens to depict women who must think carefully about their circumstances. Such clarity of purpose, however unfashionable, remains its own kind of distinction.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

84%from 21 reviews
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)100

Poised, delicate, powerful, hovering between poignancy and pealing laughter, it is a feast formed by skill and serendipity.

Liam LaceyRead Full Review →
Time100

[It presents] us with a vast range of richly developed, gorgeously played characters ... and mov[es] them gracefully through time and a lot of very pretty spaces without ever losing its conviction, its concentration or our bedazzled attention. [18 Dec 1995]

Richard SchickelRead Full Review →
San Francisco Chronicle100

It's an exuberant, well- crafted film that gets the audience involved on a gut level even before the opening credits are over.

Mick LaSalleRead Full Review →
Chicago Sun-Times63

An enjoyable film, and yet it left me somehow unsatisfied...there is too much contrivance in the way [Austen] dispatches her men to London when she is done with them.

Roger EbertRead Full Review →