WT

Pixels

2015 · Directed by Chris Columbus

🧘4

Woke Score

27

Critic

🍿51

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 23 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1447 of 1469.

🎭

Representation Casting

Score: 15/100

The film includes diverse casting with Peter Dinklage and other minority actors, but their inclusion serves primarily as a source of comedy rather than genuine representation. Dinklage's character is treated as a punchline rather than a full character.

🏳️‍🌈

LGBTQ+ Themes

Score: 0/100

There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ themes, representation, or storylines in the film.

👑

Feminist Agenda

Score: 5/100

The film is actively hostile to feminist sensibilities. Female characters exist as rewards and trophies for male protagonists, with Michelle Monaghan's character literally transformed into a trophy.

Racial Consciousness

Score: 0/100

There is no meaningful racial consciousness or commentary in the film. Minority characters appear in the cast but are not treated with particular awareness or care.

🌱

Climate Crusade

Score: 0/100

There is no evidence of climate activism, environmental consciousness, or climate-related themes in this action comedy.

💰

Eat the Rich

Score: 0/100

There is no critique of capitalism or wealth inequality. The film itself represents a massive capitalist production with no irony or commentary on this expenditure.

💗

Body Positivity

Score: 0/100

There is no body positivity messaging. The film treats disability and physical difference primarily as comedy material.

🧠

Neurodivergence

Score: 0/100

There is no meaningful engagement with neurodivergence. Peter Dinklage's casting appears to be for novelty rather than any thematic exploration of disability.

📖

Revisionist History

Score: 0/100

The film does not attempt to revise historical narratives. It simply nostalgically reproduces 1980s arcade gaming culture.

📢

Lecture Energy

Score: 0/100

The film contains no preachy moralizing or lecture-like exposition about social issues. It is primarily concerned with action sequences and jokes.

Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

Video game experts are recruited by the military to fight 1980s-era video game characters who've attacked New York.

Consciousness Assessment

Pixels arrives as a masterclass in how a contemporary blockbuster can achieve a kind of retrograde perfection, managing to feel dated before its theatrical run ended. Chris Columbus constructs a film that treats its female characters not as people but as collectible rewards, a choice so direct and unapologetic that it verges on conceptual art. Michelle Monaghan's character exists primarily as a trophy to be won, literalized in a scene where she becomes an actual trophy. The film's nostalgia for 1980s gaming culture extends, it seems, to nostalgia for 1980s attitudes toward women.

The casting of Peter Dinklage, an actor with dwarfism, alongside the film's narrative treatment of him as a punchline rather than a character, represents a particular brand of inclusion that serves the joke rather than the person. The film treats representation as something to be ticked off a box while ensuring that marginalized performers exist primarily for comedic othering. There is no evidence of environmental consciousness, climate awareness, or any systemic critique of capitalism, though one might argue the film's very existence as a product of a 90-million-dollar budget represents a kind of capitalist excess that goes entirely unremarked upon.

The result is a film so committed to its own regressive sensibilities that it achieves a kind of authenticity in its badness. It is not progressive cinema attempting to fail, nor is it a pre-2010 artifact we might excuse on historical grounds. It is a 2015 film that chose, with considerable resources, to make a movie that treats women as scenery and disability as comedy. The critical and cultural backlash the film received suggests that audiences were not entirely ready to accept this vintage of nostalgia.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

27%from 37 reviews
Charlotte Observer75

The script by Tim Herlihy and Timothy Dowling gets relaxed, throwaway laughs, even if it doesn’t always hold together.

Lawrence ToppmanRead Full Review →
Chicago Tribune63

Pixels is a blast of energetic fun.

Katie WalshRead Full Review →
New Orleans Times-Picayune60

Pixels is a slice of pure, frivolous entertainment that doesn't try to overreach.

Mike ScottRead Full Review →
IndieWire0

As a bad movie, Pixels is extremely dismissible. The ways in which it is bad are hardly fun to pick apart, a la "The Room;" instead, they're just banal — the deeply predictable plot, the unfunny jokes, the constant low-level sexism and occasional spikes of racism that permeate the story.

Roy GrahamRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting15

The film includes diverse casting with Peter Dinklage and other minority actors, but their inclusion serves primarily as a source of comedy rather than genuine representation. Dinklage's character is treated as a punchline rather than a full character.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ themes, representation, or storylines in the film.

👑
Feminist Agenda5

The film is actively hostile to feminist sensibilities. Female characters exist as rewards and trophies for male protagonists, with Michelle Monaghan's character literally transformed into a trophy.

Racial Consciousness0

There is no meaningful racial consciousness or commentary in the film. Minority characters appear in the cast but are not treated with particular awareness or care.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

There is no evidence of climate activism, environmental consciousness, or climate-related themes in this action comedy.

💰
Eat the Rich0

There is no critique of capitalism or wealth inequality. The film itself represents a massive capitalist production with no irony or commentary on this expenditure.

💗
Body Positivity0

There is no body positivity messaging. The film treats disability and physical difference primarily as comedy material.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

There is no meaningful engagement with neurodivergence. Peter Dinklage's casting appears to be for novelty rather than any thematic exploration of disability.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film does not attempt to revise historical narratives. It simply nostalgically reproduces 1980s arcade gaming culture.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film contains no preachy moralizing or lecture-like exposition about social issues. It is primarily concerned with action sequences and jokes.