WT

Passengers

2016 · Directed by Morten Tyldum

🧘8

Woke Score

40

Critic

🍿61

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 32 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1344 of 1469.

🎭

Representation Casting

Score: 45/100

The film features Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt as co-leads with relatively equal prominence in marketing and billing, representing a surface-level commitment to gender-neutral casting. However, the narrative structure subordinates Lawrence's character to Pratt's agency and desires.

🏳️‍🌈

LGBTQ+ Themes

Score: 0/100

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation are present in the film. The romance is exclusively heterosexual.

👑

Feminist Agenda

Score: 15/100

While a female lead is present, the narrative fundamentally undermines any feminist reading by romanticizing a scenario built on the male protagonist's violation of the female protagonist's consent. The film does not interrogate or critique this dynamic.

Racial Consciousness

Score: 0/100

The film contains no meaningful exploration of race, racial identity, or racial dynamics. Supporting characters of color (Laurence Fishburne, Andy Garcia) are present but serve purely functional roles.

🌱

Climate Crusade

Score: 0/100

No climate-related themes or environmental consciousness are present in the film.

💰

Eat the Rich

Score: 0/100

The film contains no critique of capitalism, class structures, or economic systems. The setting in space allows it to sidestep any engagement with material conditions.

💗

Body Positivity

Score: 0/100

The film presents conventionally attractive leads in a glossy sci-fi setting. There is no engagement with body diversity or body positivity messaging.

🧠

Neurodivergence

Score: 0/100

No representation of neurodivergent characters or exploration of neurodivergence is present.

📖

Revisionist History

Score: 0/100

As a science fiction film set in the future, the film contains no historical narrative or revisionist engagement with history.

📢

Lecture Energy

Score: 10/100

The film occasionally gestures toward moral reflection through dialogue, particularly in conversations between characters about their situation, but stops short of genuine thematic commitment or systematic exploration of its ethical premises.

Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

A spacecraft traveling to a distant colony planet and transporting thousands of people has a malfunction in its sleep chambers. As a result, two passengers are awakened 90 years early.

Consciousness Assessment

Passengers exists in a peculiar state of cultural limbo, a film that arrived in the mid-2010s with progressive casting credentials but fundamentally conservative narrative instincts. Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt share top billing as the film's two leads, and on the surface level, this represents the sort of gender-neutral star vehicle that modern studios have learned to greenlight. Yet the film's actual plot mechanics work against any progressive reading: Pratt's character awakens Lawrence's character from her sleep pod without consent, trapping her in a romantic scenario she never chose. The film attempts to frame this as a romantic dilemma rather than a violation, a tonal miscalculation that undercuts any meaningful engagement with its ethical premises. The narrative refuses to fully reckon with what it has constructed, instead pivoting toward spectacle and reconciliation.

The film's social consciousness barely registers beyond its casting choices. There are no meaningful explorations of identity, no interrogation of systemic structures, no acknowledgment of the ways power dynamics shape human relationships. Michael Sheen appears as a bartender and Laurence Fishburne as a captain, roles that do nothing to complicate or enrich the film's thematic landscape. The film is set in space, which conveniently absolves it of any need to engage with contemporary social reality. Its concerns are purely interpersonal, and even there it stumbles badly, mistaking a man's loneliness for an excuse rather than recognizing it as the source of a profound moral transgression.

What ultimately defines Passengers is its absence of cultural awareness. This is not a film attempting progressive messaging and failing, nor is it a film that earnestly engages with difficult moral questions. It is a film that happened to cast two major stars and then told a deeply regressive story without appearing to notice the contradiction. The film's box office performance reflected this confusion, opening modestly and finding more success internationally than domestically, suggesting that audiences were picking up on something fundamentally unresolved at its core.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

40%from 8 reviews
Chicago Reader70

Intelligent supernatural drama.

Staff (Not credited)Read Full Review →
Variety50

Cruising somewhere between therapy drama and paranoid thriller, this middlebrow tone poem aims for ambiguity but often veers into soporific, suspending answers (and often, viewer interest) en route to an ending that explains all.

Justin ChangRead Full Review →
Entertainment Weekly50

Turns out to be just another dud in the genre of revisionist mysteries that have been messing with our heads since Haley Joel Osment saw dead people. Only this time, the big reveal doesn't so much twist the plot as snap its neck.

Adam MarkovitzRead Full Review →
The New York Times30

A supernatural thriller so mechanically inept and lacking in suspense that it doesn't even pass muster as lowbrow Halloween-ready entertainment.

Stephen HoldenRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting45

The film features Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt as co-leads with relatively equal prominence in marketing and billing, representing a surface-level commitment to gender-neutral casting. However, the narrative structure subordinates Lawrence's character to Pratt's agency and desires.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation are present in the film. The romance is exclusively heterosexual.

👑
Feminist Agenda15

While a female lead is present, the narrative fundamentally undermines any feminist reading by romanticizing a scenario built on the male protagonist's violation of the female protagonist's consent. The film does not interrogate or critique this dynamic.

Racial Consciousness0

The film contains no meaningful exploration of race, racial identity, or racial dynamics. Supporting characters of color (Laurence Fishburne, Andy Garcia) are present but serve purely functional roles.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No climate-related themes or environmental consciousness are present in the film.

💰
Eat the Rich0

The film contains no critique of capitalism, class structures, or economic systems. The setting in space allows it to sidestep any engagement with material conditions.

💗
Body Positivity0

The film presents conventionally attractive leads in a glossy sci-fi setting. There is no engagement with body diversity or body positivity messaging.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No representation of neurodivergent characters or exploration of neurodivergence is present.

📖
Revisionist History0

As a science fiction film set in the future, the film contains no historical narrative or revisionist engagement with history.

📢
Lecture Energy10

The film occasionally gestures toward moral reflection through dialogue, particularly in conversations between characters about their situation, but stops short of genuine thematic commitment or systematic exploration of its ethical premises.