
Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre
2023 · Directed by Guy Ritchie
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Ultra Based
Critics rated this 43 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1125 of 1469.
Representation Casting
Score: 15/100
The ensemble includes Aubrey Plaza in a substantial role and some international casting, but the film does not appear to engage meaningfully with representation as a thematic concern.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 0/100
No LGBTQ+ themes or characters are evident in this spy comedy, which focuses on heist mechanics and ensemble chemistry.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 20/100
Aubrey Plaza's character appears to have agency in the narrative, but there is no evident feminist agenda or commentary about gender dynamics.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 0/100
The film shows no evidence of racial consciousness or engagement with racial themes as a narrative concern.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
Climate change is not addressed in this weapons-trafficking spy thriller.
Eat the Rich
Score: 0/100
While the plot involves stopping an illegal weapons sale, there is no anti-capitalist critique or examination of systemic economic inequality.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
The film contains no body positivity messaging or commentary on body diversity and acceptance.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
No neurodivergent representation or themes are present in the narrative.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
This contemporary spy fiction does not engage with historical revisionism.
Lecture Energy
Score: 10/100
The film maintains a light comedic tone without overt moralizing, though the premise involves stopping weapons trafficking which carries implicit moral weight.
Synopsis
Special agent Orson Fortune and his team of operatives recruit one of Hollywood's biggest movie stars to help them on an undercover mission when the sale of a deadly new weapons technology threatens to disrupt the world order.
Consciousness Assessment
Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre occupies the peculiar space of a contemporary action film that has essentially opted out of contemporary cultural conversation. Guy Ritchie's 2023 heist vehicle concerns itself with the mechanics of espionage, the logistics of international intrigue, and the chemistry of an ensemble cast populated by Jason Statham, Hugh Grant, and Aubrey Plaza. These are legitimate concerns for a film of this type, but they are also strictly orthogonal to any engagement with modern progressive sensibilities. The film exists in a bubble where representation is simply a casting choice rather than a statement, where gender is an attribute rather than a subject, and where the moral framework remains entirely traditional: stop the bad guys, secure the MacGuffin, collect the paycheck.
The critical response focused almost exclusively on the film's entertainment quotient and the charm of its ensemble dynamic, with particular praise for Grant's comic turn. No reviewer appears to have engaged with the film as a text containing progressive commentary or cultural awareness. This is not a failure on the film's part; it is simply an absence. The movie has no interest in interrogating systems of power, examining identity, or conducting any sort of cultural audit of its own premises. It is a throwback to a style of action filmmaking that predates the contemporary moment's obsession with ideological content, and in that sense it represents a deliberate retreat rather than an oversight.
That said, the film's box office performance suggests that audiences may have found even this level of disengagement insufficient compensation for a script that reviewers described as rote. The $49 million worldwide gross against an unspecified but presumably substantial budget indicates that the market has moved on from Guy Ritchie's particular brand of clever-empty action assembly. Sometimes a film's cultural irrelevance is matched by its commercial irrelevance, which is its own form of honesty.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“Ritchie, working from a script he cowrote with Ivan Atkinson and Marn Davies, has taken all of this and transformed it into a movie that’s so clever and airy yet grounded, so sparkling with devil-may-care bravado, so poised right where you want it to be — a step ahead of the audience but also leading us right along — that it gives off the charge of a great screwball comedy.”
“After the self-satisfied The Gentlemen and the slick but sparkless Wrath of Man, it’s a nice reminder that at his best, Ritchie remains an accomplished teller of tall tales.”
“Come to think of it, these are all great roles — for Statham, Plaza, and Hartnett. Everybody in Operation Fortune — yes, even Ritchie — seems to be having fun. Sometimes, that’s all you need.”
“The cast as a whole never gels together like you'd want in a big team-based spy film like this, maybe because they spend so much time in separate locations talking to each other through earpieces.”
Consciousness Markers
The ensemble includes Aubrey Plaza in a substantial role and some international casting, but the film does not appear to engage meaningfully with representation as a thematic concern.
No LGBTQ+ themes or characters are evident in this spy comedy, which focuses on heist mechanics and ensemble chemistry.
Aubrey Plaza's character appears to have agency in the narrative, but there is no evident feminist agenda or commentary about gender dynamics.
The film shows no evidence of racial consciousness or engagement with racial themes as a narrative concern.
Climate change is not addressed in this weapons-trafficking spy thriller.
While the plot involves stopping an illegal weapons sale, there is no anti-capitalist critique or examination of systemic economic inequality.
The film contains no body positivity messaging or commentary on body diversity and acceptance.
No neurodivergent representation or themes are present in the narrative.
This contemporary spy fiction does not engage with historical revisionism.
The film maintains a light comedic tone without overt moralizing, though the premise involves stopping weapons trafficking which carries implicit moral weight.