Moonraker
1979 · Directed by Lewis Gilbert
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Ultra Based
Critics rated this 62 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #746 of 1469.
Representation Casting
Score: 5/100
The cast is entirely white and predominantly European. Dr. Goodhead is female, but casting remains monocultural and reflects 1979 Hollywood standards without interrogating them.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 0/100
No LGBTQ representation or themes are present in the film. The narrative contains only heterosexual relationships.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 15/100
Dr. Holly Goodhead is a competent female scientist with agency and expertise. However, she functions primarily as a romantic interest and supporting character rather than a protagonist. Her role represents 1970s feminism rather than modern progressive sensibilities.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 0/100
No meaningful engagement with racial themes or consciousness. The film's world is presented as naturally white and European without any reflexivity on this choice.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
Climate concerns play no role in the narrative. The environmental destruction in the Amazon sequence is treated as mere backdrop for action rather than thematic commentary.
Eat the Rich
Score: 8/100
Hugo Drax is a wealthy industrialist villain, suggesting mild critique of capitalism. However, this is a generic Bond plot device rather than systematic interrogation of economic structures.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
No body positivity messaging. Physical appearance is presented conventionally, and Jaws is treated as visually grotesque due to his unusual size.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
Jaws, a character with gigantism, is presented as a one-dimensional villain and later comic relief. His condition is never treated with dignity or complexity.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
No historical revision or reexamination of past events. The film is set in a fictional present with no engagement with historical narrative.
Lecture Energy
Score: 2/100
The film contains minimal expository dialogue about social themes. It is primarily concerned with plot mechanics and action sequences rather than preachy messaging.
Synopsis
After Drax Industries' Moonraker space shuttle is hijacked, secret agent James Bond is assigned to investigate, traveling to California to meet the company's owner, the mysterious Hugo Drax. With the help of scientist Dr. Holly Goodhead, Bond soon uncovers Drax's nefarious plans for humanity, all the while fending off an old nemesis, Jaws, and venturing to Venice, Rio, the Amazon...and even outer space.
Consciousness Assessment
Moonraker presents itself as a spy thriller with no particular interest in the social consciousness markers of the modern era. The film's single concession to progressive sensibilities is Dr. Holly Goodhead, a female scientist played by Lois Chiles, who possesses agency and expertise in her field. She is, however, ultimately a supporting character whose primary function remains romantic entanglement with the protagonist. The surrounding cast is uniformly white and European, reflecting the production values and casting practices of 1979 without any apparent awareness of such homogeneity as a choice worth examining.
The film contains no LGBTQ representation, no engagement with feminist critique beyond the presence of a competent woman, and no meaningful exploration of class struggle, environmental concerns, neurodivergence, or historical revision. Jaws, a recurring villain with a physical disability (gigantism), appears as a comedic henchman whose condition exists solely for spectacle and later, inexplicably, for romantic subplot purposes. This treatment is neither sensitive nor actively hostile; it is simply indifferent to the notion that disability might warrant consideration beyond visual novelty.
What we have here is a straightforward product of its era: a escapist action film that exists before the cultural markers we now use to measure social consciousness had solidified into their current forms. Moonraker is innocent of wokeness not through active resistance but through temporal displacement. It is, in essence, pre-woke in the most literal sense."
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“Broccoli serves the audience a space-shuttle hijacking, a jumbo-jet explosion and a protracted wrestling match between two men who are falling from the sky without parachutes. All this happens before the opening credits. From there, it's on to gondola chases in Venice, funicular crashes in Rio and laser-gun shootouts and lovemaking in deep space. Meanwhile, beautiful women come and go, talking (ever so discreetly) about fellatio. When Broccoli lays out a feast, he makes sure that there is at least one course for every conceivable taste...The result is a film that is irresistibly entertaining as only truly mindless spectacle can be.”
“THE BOND by which to compare all other Bonds is Goldfinger and by that standard Moonraker, the 11th chapter in the exploits of Agent 007, is second-best. But, by the standards of most of the other candy served up as summer fare, Moonraker is marzipan - it's so insubstantial it melts in your mouth, but its flavor is distinctive and you can't get enough of it. [30 June 1979]”
“Moonraker begins with one of the funniest and most dangerous (as well as most beautifully photographed and edited) sequences Bond has ever faced. ”
“This one doesn't look too bad, but it has no snap, no tension. It's an exhausted movie. ”
Consciousness Markers
The cast is entirely white and predominantly European. Dr. Goodhead is female, but casting remains monocultural and reflects 1979 Hollywood standards without interrogating them.
No LGBTQ representation or themes are present in the film. The narrative contains only heterosexual relationships.
Dr. Holly Goodhead is a competent female scientist with agency and expertise. However, she functions primarily as a romantic interest and supporting character rather than a protagonist. Her role represents 1970s feminism rather than modern progressive sensibilities.
No meaningful engagement with racial themes or consciousness. The film's world is presented as naturally white and European without any reflexivity on this choice.
Climate concerns play no role in the narrative. The environmental destruction in the Amazon sequence is treated as mere backdrop for action rather than thematic commentary.
Hugo Drax is a wealthy industrialist villain, suggesting mild critique of capitalism. However, this is a generic Bond plot device rather than systematic interrogation of economic structures.
No body positivity messaging. Physical appearance is presented conventionally, and Jaws is treated as visually grotesque due to his unusual size.
Jaws, a character with gigantism, is presented as a one-dimensional villain and later comic relief. His condition is never treated with dignity or complexity.
No historical revision or reexamination of past events. The film is set in a fictional present with no engagement with historical narrative.
The film contains minimal expository dialogue about social themes. It is primarily concerned with plot mechanics and action sequences rather than preachy messaging.