WT

It

2017 · Directed by Andy Muschietti · $1.4M domestic

🧘8

Woke Score

69

Critic

🍿78

Audience

Ultra Based

Critics rated this 61 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #643 of 1469.

🎭

Representation Casting

Score: 32/100

The cast includes actors of various racial backgrounds (Chosen Jacobs as a Black character, Sophia Lillis as female lead) and is notably diverse, but this diversity is organic to the story rather than serving as contemporary social commentary.

🏳️‍🌈

LGBTQ+ Themes

Score: 0/100

No LGBTQ representation or themes in It Chapter One. The Richie Tozier subplot emerges only in Chapter Two and is not present in this film.

👑

Feminist Agenda

Score: 15/100

Beverly is a capable female protagonist who stands as an equal among the Losers Club, but the film does not engage in feminist messaging or commentary about gender dynamics.

Racial Consciousness

Score: 12/100

While the cast is diverse, there is minimal exploration of racial themes or consciousness. Mike Hanlon's race is incidental to his role in the story rather than being addressed thematically.

🌱

Climate Crusade

Score: 0/100

No climate-related themes, messaging, or environmental crusading present in the film.

💰

Eat the Rich

Score: 0/100

No anti-capitalist critique or eat-the-rich messaging. The film does not engage with economic systems or class struggle.

💗

Body Positivity

Score: 0/100

No body positivity agenda or commentary on body image. The film does not address these themes.

🧠

Neurodivergence

Score: 0/100

No representation of neurodivergence or commentary on neurodivergent experiences. The characters do not exhibit or discuss neurodivergent traits.

📖

Revisionist History

Score: 0/100

The film is set in 1989 and does not attempt to revise or reinterpret historical events or narratives.

📢

Lecture Energy

Score: 0/100

The film does not lecture the audience about social issues. It prioritizes narrative momentum and scares over preachy messaging.

Consciousness MeterUltra Based
Ultra BasedPeak Consciousness
Share this score

Synopsis

In a small town in Maine, seven children known as The Losers Club come face to face with life problems, bullies and a monster that takes the shape of a clown called Pennywise.

Consciousness Assessment

It (2017) is a horror film that happens to feature a diverse cast without making that diversity the subject of the film itself. The Losers Club includes children of various racial and ethnic backgrounds, and a female protagonist who is treated as an equal member of the group, but these elements are woven into the fabric of the narrative rather than highlighted for commentary. The film's concerns are fundamentally supernatural and psychological, centered on childhood trauma, bullying, and the power of friendship to overcome fear. Any progressive sensibilities present are incidental rather than intentional.

The film contains no LGBTQ representation worth noting in this first chapter, no environmental messaging, no anti-capitalist critique, and no particular interest in contemporary social consciousness. What we have instead is a competent adaptation of a 1986 novel that respects the source material while updating the visual language to contemporary standards. The bullying sequences, while uncomfortable, serve the plot rather than existing to make a statement about systemic oppression.

This is ultimately a commercial horror film that achieved massive success because it is well-crafted and taps into genuine scares and emotional stakes. Its diversity is unremarkable in the modern context, which is perhaps the point. It simply exists without needing to announce or justify its casting choices, and that restraint is precisely why it scores as low as it does on the metrics of cultural messaging.

Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm

Critic Reviews

69%from 49 reviews
Chicago Sun-Times100

IT...carried me along from the opening frame, rarely missing a beat.

Richard RoeperRead Full Review →
San Francisco Chronicle100

It’s smart and funny and makes great effort to capture not just a time and place, but the specific feelings of being on the verge of adulthood and thinking the world is against you.

Peter HartlaubRead Full Review →
IGN92

IT may not be the best Stephen King movie (even though it comes impressively close), but it’s probably the MOST Stephen King movie.

William BibbianiRead Full Review →
The Seattle Times38

Childhood: courtesy of Mr. King. Filtered through the pedestrian sensibilities of director Andy Muschietti, who seemingly never met a horror-movie cliché he couldn’t incorporate into his adaptation of King’s thousand-page-plus mega-opus.

Soren AndersenRead Full Review →

Consciousness Markers

🎭
Representation Casting32

The cast includes actors of various racial backgrounds (Chosen Jacobs as a Black character, Sophia Lillis as female lead) and is notably diverse, but this diversity is organic to the story rather than serving as contemporary social commentary.

🏳️‍🌈
LGBTQ+ Themes0

No LGBTQ representation or themes in It Chapter One. The Richie Tozier subplot emerges only in Chapter Two and is not present in this film.

👑
Feminist Agenda15

Beverly is a capable female protagonist who stands as an equal among the Losers Club, but the film does not engage in feminist messaging or commentary about gender dynamics.

Racial Consciousness12

While the cast is diverse, there is minimal exploration of racial themes or consciousness. Mike Hanlon's race is incidental to his role in the story rather than being addressed thematically.

🌱
Climate Crusade0

No climate-related themes, messaging, or environmental crusading present in the film.

💰
Eat the Rich0

No anti-capitalist critique or eat-the-rich messaging. The film does not engage with economic systems or class struggle.

💗
Body Positivity0

No body positivity agenda or commentary on body image. The film does not address these themes.

🧠
Neurodivergence0

No representation of neurodivergence or commentary on neurodivergent experiences. The characters do not exhibit or discuss neurodivergent traits.

📖
Revisionist History0

The film is set in 1989 and does not attempt to revise or reinterpret historical events or narratives.

📢
Lecture Energy0

The film does not lecture the audience about social issues. It prioritizes narrative momentum and scares over preachy messaging.