
Eyes Wide Shut
1999 · Directed by Stanley Kubrick
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Ultra Based
Critics rated this 51 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #642 of 1469.
Representation Casting
Score: 0/100
The cast is predominantly white and heterosexual. There is no meaningful attention to underrepresented groups in the casting or narrative.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 5/100
A minor male character (played by Alan Cumming) appears as a gay waiter in one scene, but this is incidental and not thematically developed.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 35/100
The film examines gender power dynamics and male vulnerability in marriage, with Alice's sexual autonomy as a central catalyst. However, Kubrick's treatment of female sexuality is largely from a male perspective, and scholars note he struggled to fully explore women's agency rather than male anxiety about it.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 0/100
The film contains no meaningful engagement with racial themes or consciousness. Race is entirely absent from the narrative and thematic concerns.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
No climate or environmental themes appear in this psychological drama about marital sexuality and male jealousy.
Eat the Rich
Score: 15/100
The film depicts wealth and elite social circles, and includes commentary on commercialized sexuality and transactional relationships, but this critique is incidental rather than systemic or developed.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
The film contains no body positivity messaging. Sexuality is presented through a conventional lens focused on conventionally attractive bodies.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
No neurodivergent characters or themes are present in the narrative.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
The film is a contemporary psychological drama with no historical setting or revisionist historical themes.
Lecture Energy
Score: 20/100
The film has a dreamlike, narrative-driven quality rather than preachy messaging, though some scenes of exposition and symbolic confrontation carry a slightly pedagogical tone about male jealousy and power.
Synopsis
After Dr. Bill Harford's wife, Alice, admits to having sexual fantasies about a man she met, Bill becomes obsessed with having a sexual encounter. He discovers an underground sexual group and attends one of their meetings -- and quickly discovers that he is in over his head.
Consciousness Assessment
Stanley Kubrick's final film remains a fastidious examination of male anxiety dressed in the costumes of erotic exploration. What makes "Eyes Wide Shut" somewhat remarkable from a progressive sensibilities standpoint is not what it achieves, but what it explicitly fails to achieve. The film positions Alice Harford, played by Nicole Kidman, as the agent of disruption, her admission of sexual fantasy triggering the entire narrative machinery. Yet the film is fundamentally concerned with Bill's jealousy, humiliation, and obsessive response to her autonomy rather than with exploring her own desire. Scholarly analysis has noted that Kubrick, despite his meticulous attention to gender dynamics, ultimately rendered the film as a study of male vulnerability rather than female liberation. This is not progressive social consciousness so much as a sophisticated male gaze preoccupied with its own threatened status.
The film's engagement with capitalism and commercialized sexuality provides its most substantive moments of social critique, though even this remains underdeveloped. The masked orgy scene and the various transactional sexual encounters Bill witnesses suggest a world where intimacy has been commodified, yet Kubrick never extends this observation into systemic analysis. The representation remains narrow and conventionally attractive, with no meaningful diversity in casting or perspective. The sole queer character appears as a minor plot device rather than as a fully realized presence in the world.
Kubrick's final work engages with sexuality and gender in formally sophisticated ways without embracing the specific markers of 2020s progressive consciousness. It is a film about the anxiety of privilege confronting its own limitations, executed with characteristic precision but without the ideological commitments that would align it with contemporary social consciousness movements.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“Kubrick left one more brilliantly provocative tour de force as his epitaph.”
“Eyes Wide Shut still towers above most of the movies out there, immersing the viewer in a web of emotional complexity, at once raw and personal and, at times, theatrically overcooked.”
“A precisely modulated and mostly mesmerizing 2¾-hour suspense movie, in part because it's one of the most bravely disturbing screen works ever attempted about thoughts withheld by even the most devoted marriage partners and the ramifications of voicing them.”
“Kubrick's much-anticipated final film boils down to the most elaborate monogamy lecture ever.”
Consciousness Markers
The cast is predominantly white and heterosexual. There is no meaningful attention to underrepresented groups in the casting or narrative.
A minor male character (played by Alan Cumming) appears as a gay waiter in one scene, but this is incidental and not thematically developed.
The film examines gender power dynamics and male vulnerability in marriage, with Alice's sexual autonomy as a central catalyst. However, Kubrick's treatment of female sexuality is largely from a male perspective, and scholars note he struggled to fully explore women's agency rather than male anxiety about it.
The film contains no meaningful engagement with racial themes or consciousness. Race is entirely absent from the narrative and thematic concerns.
No climate or environmental themes appear in this psychological drama about marital sexuality and male jealousy.
The film depicts wealth and elite social circles, and includes commentary on commercialized sexuality and transactional relationships, but this critique is incidental rather than systemic or developed.
The film contains no body positivity messaging. Sexuality is presented through a conventional lens focused on conventionally attractive bodies.
No neurodivergent characters or themes are present in the narrative.
The film is a contemporary psychological drama with no historical setting or revisionist historical themes.
The film has a dreamlike, narrative-driven quality rather than preachy messaging, though some scenes of exposition and symbolic confrontation carry a slightly pedagogical tone about male jealousy and power.