Due Date
2010 · Directed by Todd Phillips
Woke Score
CriticCritic Score
Audience
Ultra Based
Critics rated this 51 points above its woke score. Among Ultra Based films, this critic score ranks #1148 of 1469.
Representation Casting
Score: 0/100
The cast is predominantly white with Jamie Foxx and RZA appearing only in minor, underdeveloped roles with no thematic significance.
LGBTQ+ Themes
Score: 0/100
No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation appear in the film.
Feminist Agenda
Score: 0/100
The narrative centers entirely on male characters and their relationship; female characters exist only as plot devices.
Racial Consciousness
Score: 0/100
No engagement with racial themes or consciousness; minority performers appear in background roles without thematic purpose.
Climate Crusade
Score: 0/100
No climate-related themes or environmental consciousness present in the film.
Eat the Rich
Score: 0/100
The protagonist is a successful businessman; the film contains no critique of capitalism or wealth structures.
Body Positivity
Score: 0/100
No engagement with body positivity; physical appearance is used for traditional comedic effect.
Neurodivergence
Score: 0/100
Eccentric character behavior is played for laughs without any consciousness of neurodivergence or respectful representation.
Revisionist History
Score: 0/100
No historical themes or revisionist history present in this contemporary comedy.
Lecture Energy
Score: 0/100
The film has no preachy or preachy quality; it functions as straightforward entertainment without moral instruction.
Synopsis
Peter Highman must scramble across the US in five days to be present for the birth of his first child. He gets off to a bad start when his wallet and luggage are stolen, and put on the 'no-fly' list. Peter embarks on a terrifying journey when he accepts a ride from an actor.
Consciousness Assessment
Due Date represents the sort of mainstream comedy that emerged from the late 2000s with zero consciousness of progressive social sensibilities. Todd Phillips constructs a simple buddy narrative in which a type-A businessman and an eccentric aspiring actor traverse the country in a series of escalating misadventures. The film is content to exist as pure entertainment, indifferent to any broader cultural commentary. Its cast, while including some performers of color, treats these individuals as background fixtures rather than as subjects worthy of narrative attention. The humor derives from slapstick, character incompatibility, and absurdist situations, not from any interrogation of social structures or hierarchies. What remains striking about this film in retrospect is its complete imperviousness to the cultural concerns that would come to dominate discourse in the years following its release. It is a work of its era: a comedy about two men bonding over their journey, uncomplicated by self-awareness or any sense that the world might contain tensions worth examining.
Analysis generated by our Consciousness Algorithm
Critic Reviews
“Phillips goes too far sometimes (border-jail breakout?), but his new direction is promising.”
“It's hard to resist the pairing of such talented actors as Robert Downey Jr. and Zack Galifianakis - and they prove why here. They are funny guys, both of whom make the most of the material.”
“Shockingly, it's funny. Often in shocking or at least wildly inappropriate ways.”
“The comedy never really takes off because it's phony.”
Consciousness Markers
The cast is predominantly white with Jamie Foxx and RZA appearing only in minor, underdeveloped roles with no thematic significance.
No LGBTQ+ themes, characters, or representation appear in the film.
The narrative centers entirely on male characters and their relationship; female characters exist only as plot devices.
No engagement with racial themes or consciousness; minority performers appear in background roles without thematic purpose.
No climate-related themes or environmental consciousness present in the film.
The protagonist is a successful businessman; the film contains no critique of capitalism or wealth structures.
No engagement with body positivity; physical appearance is used for traditional comedic effect.
Eccentric character behavior is played for laughs without any consciousness of neurodivergence or respectful representation.
No historical themes or revisionist history present in this contemporary comedy.
The film has no preachy or preachy quality; it functions as straightforward entertainment without moral instruction.